Price: $0.19806 2.74%
Market Cap: 29.06B 1.1252%
Volume (24h): 4.01B 0.2%
Dominance: 1.1252%
Price: $0.19806 2.74%
Market Cap: 29.06B 1.1252%
Volume (24h): 4.01B 0.2%
Dominance: 1.1252% 1.1252%
  • Price: $0.19806 2.74%
  • Market Cap: 29.06B 1.1252%
  • Volume (24h): 4.01B 0.2%
  • Dominance: 1.1252% 1.1252%
  • Price: $0.19806 2.74%
  • Jun / 19
  • Oct / 10
    • Breaking: Bitstamp Resumes XRP Trading After Temporary SUSPension
      Oct 10, 2023 at 08:16 pm Cryptonews.com
      Bitstamp resumes XRP trading after a temporary suspension. Breaking news revealed an issue with XRP trading on Bitstamp, but the exchange quickly announced the resumption of trading. Bitstamp acknowledged the problem and assured its community that a specialized team was actively working on a resolution. Users expressed frustration, speculating unconfirmed issues with Dogecoin (DOGE) trading pairs.
  • Aug / 26
    • USPTO Rejects Dogecoin Trademark Bid Due to Decentralization
      Aug 26, 2023 at 01:30 am CryptosHeadlines.com
      The USPTO rejects Dogecoin trademark bid, citing decentralization. This surprising decision raises concerns about the cryptocurrency's integrity and decentralized nature. The trademark application, featuring a golden medallion design with the iconic Shiba Inu dog and the letter "D," aimed for uses in blockchain education and distributed computing. However, the USPTO deemed the design as "merely descriptive" and generic, aligning with Dogecoin's decentralized essence. The final decision remains uncertain.
  • Jul / 21
    • Possible identities of AnubisDAO rug pull sUSPects revealed
      Jul 21, 2023 at 02:30 am crypto.news
      Two years ago, AnubisDAO, a decentralized autonomous organization, experienced a rug pull, losing approximately $60 million worth of Ethereum (ETH). Sadly, the funds were never recovered. However, diligent block analysts have been closely monitoring the exploiter wallets associated with AnubisDAO. Recent on-chain analysis by ZachXBT has shed light on the identities of the suspected scammers. Deeper investigation reveals that the stolen funds ended up in two exchange deposit addresses, namely 0x51da686c7a2f973ad11fafed6ce9a3ffc020349f (labeled as (1)) and 0x253d7ba533b7d13720fb5ec5a7d1e64d4ff3f58b (l
« 12 »
« 12 »

Select Language

Select Currency