Before you reading,Don't miss coins like PEPE again! Click here to find new PEPEs!
閱讀之前，不要再錯過PEPE這樣的幣了！點擊此處查找新的 PEPE！

Chris Dixon, a general partner at Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), has raised concerns over the US regulatory system’s treatment of meme coins versus other cryptocurrencies and blockchain tokens.
Dixon questions why meme coins, which are often used for humor and speculation, are allowed to thrive while other crypto companies face regulatory hurdles.
He argues for better regulation to protect investors and prevent get-rich-quick schemes.

Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) 的普通合夥人 Chris Dixon 對美國監管體系相對於其他加密貨幣和區塊鏈代幣對待 meme 幣的方式表示擔憂。迪克森質疑為什麼經常用於幽默和投機的迷因幣能夠蓬勃發展，而其他加密公司卻面臨監管障礙。他主張加強監管以保護投資者並防止快速致富計畫。

Amidst the resurgence of meme coins, concerns are being raised about the US regulatory system’s approach towards these tokens compared to other cryptocurrencies and blockchain tokens.
Trapped in “Regulatory Purgatory”
Chris Dixon, a general partner at Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), has expressed concern over the US regulatory system. He questions why meme coins, tokens primarily used for humor and stemming from online communities’ in-jokes, are allowed to thrive while cryptocurrency companies and blockchain tokens with useful applications “get stuck in regulatory purgatory” due to potential classification as securities. Dixon highlights the disparity in regulation, where meme-only tokens can easily launch and trade, while entrepreneurs developing lasting projects face regulatory obstacles.

在meme 幣的復興中，與其他加密貨幣和區塊鏈代幣相比，人們對美國監管體系對這些代幣的態度提出了擔憂。 Dixon 表達了擔憂超越美國的監管體系。他質疑為什麼迷因幣（主要用於幽默和源自線上社群笑話的代幣）能夠蓬勃發展，而加密貨幣公司和具有有用應用程式的區塊鏈代幣由於可能被歸類為證券而「陷入監管煉獄」。迪克森強調了監管方面的差異，僅模因的代幣可以輕鬆啟動和交易，而開發持久項目的企業家則面臨監管障礙。

Read the full article for FREE at COINOTAG!
在 COINOTAG 免費閱讀全文！