In a legal maneuver, Elon Musk and Tesla have launched a counterattack against Evan Spencer, the lawyer representing the plaintiffs in the Dogecoin lawsuit. The tech billionaire and his company have filed a motion for Rule 11 sanctions against Spencer, alleging that he knew his case was based on a false premise before filing the claims.

The recent court filing by Musk and Tesla comes after Spencer filed an amended complaint on behalf of the plaintiffs, accusing Musk of manipulating the price of Dogecoin for personal gains. The amended complaint claimed that Musk dumped DOGE after promoting it on Twitter. However, the latest filing by Musk’s legal team argues that the wallets mentioned in the amended complaint do not belong to Tesla or Musk.

머스크와 테슬라가 최근 법원에 제출한 소송은 스펜서가 원고를 대신해 머스크가 개인적인 이익을 위해 도지코인 가격을 조작했다고 비난하는 수정된 소장을 제출한 이후 나온 것입니다. 수정된 고소장은 머스크가 DOGE를 트위터에 홍보한 뒤 이를 버렸다고 주장했습니다. 그러나 머스크 법무팀이 최근 제출한 자료에는 수정된 고소장에 언급된 지갑이 테슬라나 머스크의 소유가 아니라고 주장하고 있다.

According to the filing, Musk and Tesla assert that Spencer was aware of this fact before submitting the amended complaint, which also included allegations of insider trading. They are urging the overseeing judge to dismiss the amended complaint and impose sanctions on Spencer.

서류에 따르면 머스크와 테슬라는 스펜서가 내부자 거래 혐의도 포함된 수정된 고소장을 제출하기 전에 이 사실을 알고 있었다고 주장합니다. 그들은 감독 판사에게 수정된 고소장을 기각하고 스펜서에게 제재를 가할 것을 촉구하고 있습니다.

Following the news of the motion for sanctions, Dogecoin experienced a decline of over 7% in value. At the time of writing, the meme token was trading at $0.0699.

This latest move represents an offensive strategy by Musk and Tesla to challenge the claims made by the Dogecoin plaintiffs and their lawyer. The legal battle between the parties continues to unfold, with both sides vigorously defending their positions. The outcome of the lawsuit will likely have significant implications for the future of Dogecoin and the role of influencers in the cryptocurrency market.

Tesla와 Elon Musk가 Dogecoin 원고 측 변호사에 대한 공격 개시 게시물이 BitcoinWorld에 처음으로 나타났습니다.