Dogecoin Faces Security Crisis
A critical vulnerability in the Dogecoin (DOGE) network was exploited, leading to a 69% crash in its active nodes. Andreas Kohl, co-founder of the Bitcoin sidechain Sequentia, claimed responsibility for the exploit, revealing that he utilized an obsolete laptop in El Salvador to execute the attack.
Prior to the incident, Blockchair data indicated 647 active Dogecoin nodes. Post-exploit, the number plummeted to 315.
Kohl attributed the attack to a vulnerability identified by researcher Tobias Ruck. The exploit, dubbed "DogeReaper," was unveiled by the "Department Of DOGE Efficiency" on X on December 4th. The account described the vulnerability as a potent tool capable of remotely crashing any Dogecoin node.
They drew parallels to the fictional "Death Note" from Japanese manga, where inscribing a name in the notebook results in a heart attack-induced demise. Similarly, the DogeReaper exploit enables attackers to target a node's address, causing it to crash due to a segmentation fault.
Segmentation faults occur when a program attempts to access unauthorized memory, prompting the operating system to terminate the program for security reasons. With Dogecoin nodes being publicly identifiable, the exploit posed a significant threat to the network. The account cautioned that a malicious actor could potentially cripple the entire Dogecoin network for days, suspending transactions and block production.
Despite the vulnerability's potential severity, Coinbase deemed its impact low and awarded Ruck a $200 bounty for reporting the issue.
Australia Proposes Stricter Crypto Oversight
Australia has taken a proactive stance in safeguarding its citizens against crypto-related crimes. It has proposed stricter Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing (AML/CTF) rules to enhance oversight of the cryptocurrency industry and combat financial crimes.
The Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Center (AUSTRAC) introduced the draft rules following recent amendments to the AML/CTF Act passed by parliament in November. These changes aim to close regulatory gaps, increase oversight of high-risk sectors, enhance customer due diligence (CDD) measures, and enforce stricter reporting and compliance requirements for businesses.
The proposed reforms extend regulatory oversight to sectors deemed high-risk, such as cryptocurrency exchanges, legal services, and real estate businesses. Businesses will be required to implement stricter CDD processes, monitor suspicious transactions, and ensure transparency in cross-border asset transfers. Additionally, the framework mandates adherence to the Travel Rule for international transactions, requiring detailed information on the origin and destination of transfers.
Another goal of the proposal is to reduce compliance burdens by introducing an outcomes-based compliance model. This approach allows businesses to tailor compliance efforts to their size, structure, and risk profile while maintaining stringent standards. The draft framework retains necessary exemptions from the previous regime through the AML/CTF General Rule 2025 and the AML/CTF (Exemptions) Rule 2007, while eliminating outdated requirements.
AUSTRAC has invited stakeholders, including financial institutions, legal practitioners, and crypto exchanges, to provide feedback on the draft rules during the consultation period, which will be open from December 11th to February 14th, 2025.
Australia's commitment to consumer safety is further evidenced by AUSTRAC's launch of a task force on December 6th to ensure compliance among crypto ATM providers. This is a significant step towards reducing the criminal misuse of cryptocurrency in the country.
Kraken Australia Fined for Regulatory Breaches
Australia's Federal Court recently imposed an 8 million Australian dollar ($5.1 million) fine on Bit Trade, the Australian operator of the Kraken cryptocurrency exchange. This action was the result of a successful legal action by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).
Justice John Nicholas delivered the judgment on December 12th, ordering Bit Trade to pay the fine within 60 days and cover court costs. The penalty stems from Bit Trade's failure to meet design and distribution obligations and its operation as a credit facility without a proper license.
The fine significantly exceeded Bit Trade's proposed $2.5 million, which the court deemed inadequate. A Kraken spokesperson expressed disappointment with the ruling, arguing the need for clearer crypto-specific legislation in Australia to address regulatory uncertainties affecting investors and businesses. Kraken suggested the ruling could potentially hinder economic growth in Australia.
The case centered on Bit Trade's offering of a "margin extension" product, which allowed users to trade crypto or fiat with leverage without the required target market determination (TMD). ASIC Chair Joe Longo criticized the absence of a TMD, emphasizing its importance in ensuring financial products are not inappropriately marketed to consumers. Longo revealed that over 1,100 Australians used the product, incurring over $7 million in fees and interest while losing more than $5 million collectively. One investor alone lost nearly $4 million.
Justice Nicholas characterized Bit Trade's actions as serious violations driven by revenue maximization. He also noted that the margin extension was provided without regard to compliance with corporate laws until ASIC's intervention. Despite becoming aware of the need for a TMD, Bit Trade continued offering the product to retail clients without making the necessary adjustments.
ASIC hailed the decision as a major milestone, marking the regulator's first penalty against a crypto entity for failing to have a TMD.
Court Fines IcomTech Fraudsters
A California court has also recently ordered five individuals involved in the IcomTech Ponzi scheme to pay over $5 million for fraud and misappropriation of funds. The default judgment found David Carmona, Juan Arellano Parra, Moses Valdez, and David Brend liable for violations of the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC regulations. Marco A. Ruiz Ochoa agreed to a consent order. The ruling stems from a May 2023 lawsuit by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).
The scheme defrauded 190 victims in the United States and abroad, soliciting over $1 million by falsely claiming to invest in Bitcoin (BTC) and other cryptocurrencies through a fake mining and trading platform. Instead, the perpetrators misappropriated approximately $8.4 million of the victims' funds by December 2022.
Each of the four individuals was ordered to pay a $1 million civil monetary penalty, and along with Ochoa, approximately $1 million in restitution to victims, totaling over $5 million. All five individuals were permanently barred from registering with the CFTC or trading in CFTC-regulated markets.
The mastermind, Carmona, was sentenced to 10 years in prison in October for conspiracy to commit wire fraud. Rodriguez, another key figure, was sentenced to eight years in late October, Brend received a 10-year sentence in December, and Ochoa was sentenced to five years in January.
IcomTech operated between 2018 and 2019, promising investors 100% returns every six weeks. The perpetrators also hosted lavish expos in the U.S. and internationally, arriving in luxury cars and wearing high-end clothing to project success and attract unsuspecting investors.