在閱讀之前，您是否錯過了 PEPE？別擔心，請點擊此處查看 100 倍的潛在迷因！

• A promotion gone awry: Coinbase’s Dogecoin sweepstakes leads to a Supreme Court showdown.

這次促銷活動出了差錯：Coinbase 的狗狗幣抽獎活動引發了最高法院的攤牌。

• Participants allege that the crypto exchange’s fine print misled them, overshadowing a free entry option.

參與者聲稱，加密貨幣交易所的細則誤導了他們，掩蓋了免費入場選項。

• The case becomes a pivotal moment for legal interpretations of arbitration clauses in the digital age.

該案成為數位時代仲裁條款法律解釋的關鍵時刻。

Coinbase’s Dogecoin sweepstakes, intended to drive platform engagement, now faces legal challenges that have escalated to the U.S. Supreme Court, setting a precedent for consumer rights and corporate transparency.

Coinbase 的狗狗幣抽獎活動旨在推動平台參與度，但現在面臨已升級至美國最高法院的法律挑戰，為消費者權利和企業透明度樹立了先例。

Court Denies Coinbase Arbitration Move

法院否認 Coinbase 仲裁舉措

The promotional enthusiasm surrounding Coinbase’s Dogecoin giveaway has turned into a legal skirmish, with a federal judge rejecting the company’s push for arbitration. The plaintiff, David Suski, leads the charge against the exchange, alleging deceptive practices to boost Dogecoin trading, culminating in a class action that has garnered the attention of the highest court in the United States.

圍繞 Coinbase 贈送狗狗幣的促銷熱情已經演變成一場法律衝突，一名聯邦法官駁回了該公司提出的仲裁請求。原告大衛·蘇斯基 (David Suski) 對交易所提出指控，指控其採取欺騙性做法來促進狗狗幣交易，最終引發集體訴訟，引起了美國最高法院的關注。

Legal Spotlight on Coinbase’s Promotional Practices

Coinbase 促銷行為的法律焦點

The lawsuit accuses Coinbase of purposefully downplaying a no-purchase-necessary entry option for its $1.2 million Dogecoin sweepstakes, pointing to this as a tactic to enhance trading volume and, consequently, the company’s profits. This legal contest focuses on the fine line between marketing strategies and the obligation towards transparent communication with consumers.

該訴訟指控 Coinbase 故意淡化其價值 120 萬美元的狗狗幣抽獎活動中無需購買的入場選項，並指出這是一種提高交易量的策略，從而提高公司的利潤。這場法律競賽的重點是行銷策略和與消費者進行透明溝通的義務之間的界線。

Supreme Court to Review Coinbase’s Arbitration Clauses

最高法院將審查 Coinbase 的仲裁條款

In a notable development, the U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to review the decision to keep the sweepstakes-related claims in court. This marks a significant moment for Coinbase as it struggles with the repercussions of its arbitration agreements, challenging the enforcement of such clauses amidst growing concerns over consumer rights in the digital domain.

一個值得注意的進展是，美國最高法院已同意審查將抽獎相關索賠保留在法庭上的決定。這對 Coinbase 來說是一個重要時刻，因為它正在努力應對仲裁協議的影響，在數位領域消費者權利日益受到關注的情況下挑戰此類條款的執行。

The Controversy Behind the Free Entry Method

免費入場方式背後的爭議

The crux of the class action is the allegation that Coinbase deliberately obscured the alternative, cost-free sweepstakes entry route to manipulate its Dogecoin trading volumes. With the legal argument centered on California’s consumer protection laws, the outcome of this case could have widespread implications for advertising practices in the crypto industry.

集體訴訟的關鍵是指控 Coinbase 故意掩蓋替代的、免費的抽獎進入途徑，以操縱其狗狗幣交易量。由於法律論點集中在加州的消費者保護法，此案的結果可能會對加密產業的廣告實踐產生廣泛的影響。

Implications for Coinbase and Sweepstakes Entrants

對 Coinbase 和抽獎活動參與者的影響

David Suski, representing the sweepstakes participants who opted for the paid entry, claims the lack of clear disclosure violated California’s false advertising and competition statutes. The suit seeks restitution exceeding $5 million and has raised critical questions about the enforceability of consumer agreements versus promotional terms.

選擇付費參與的抽獎參與者的代表戴維·蘇斯基 (David Suski) 聲稱，缺乏明確的披露違反了加州的虛假廣告和競爭法規。該訴訟要求賠償超過 500 萬美元，並提出了有關消費者協議與促銷條款的可執行性的關鍵問題。

Coinbase’s Legal Defense and Past Arbitration Success

Coinbase 的法律辯護和過去的仲裁成功

Coinbase, standing by its user agreements that mandate arbitration, must now present a compelling argument to the Supreme Court to reverse the lower court’s ruling. The company’s prior success in moving a different user lawsuit to arbitration casts a shadow of precedent, yet the current case could pivot in an unexpected direction.

Coinbase 堅持其強制仲裁的用戶協議，現在必須向最高法院提出令人信服的論點，以推翻下級法院的裁決。該公司先前成功地將另一起用戶訴訟提交仲裁，這為先例蒙上了一層陰影，但目前的案件可能會朝著意想不到的方向發展。

Public Response and Industry Critique

公眾反應與產業批評

The public reaction, particularly from the cryptocurrency community on platforms like Reddit, has been one of dismay and criticism, with accusations that Coinbase exploited the sweepstakes to artificially pump Dogecoin’s trading metrics. This sentiment underscores a broader skepticism towards Coinbase’s marketing methods and its handling of meme tokens like Dogecoin.

公眾的反應，尤其是來自 Reddit 等平台上的加密貨幣社群的反應，是一種沮喪和批評，指責 Coinbase 利用抽獎活動人為推高狗狗幣的交易指標。這種情緒凸顯了人們對 Coinbase 的營銷方法及其對狗狗幣等迷因代幣的處理方式的更廣泛懷疑。

Conclusion

結論

The Dogecoin sweepstakes saga places Coinbase at a legal crossroads, with the Supreme Court set to weigh in on a matter that intertwines marketing strategies with the ethical responsibility of disclosure. The ruling will not only determine the fate of the class action against Coinbase but also shape future corporate conduct and the transparency expected in promotions within the rapidly evolving crypto landscape.

狗狗幣抽獎事件將 Coinbase 置於法律的十字路口，最高法院將介入這項將行銷策略與資訊揭露的道德責任交織在一起的問題。該裁決不僅將決定針對 Coinbase 的集體訴訟的命運，還將影響未來的企業行為以及在快速發展的加密領域中促銷活動的透明度。

The post Dogecoin Sweepstakes Sparks Legal Battle as Coinbase Faces Supreme Court Scrutiny! appeared first on COINOTAG NEWS.

Coinbase 面臨最高法院審查，狗狗幣抽獎活動引發法律訴訟！首先出現在 COINOTAG 新聞上。

你錯過了PEPE嗎？別擔心，請點擊此處查看 100 倍的潛在迷因！