Wikipedia’s founder, JimmyWales, recently garnered attention with a controversy he initiated. In a statement he made on social media a short while ago, he compared the reliability of banks with Bitcoin’s functionality, sparking a heated debate. Among those who joined the debate were prominent figures in the crypto world such as XRP lawyer John Deaton and Dogecoin founder Billy Markus.
Critical Comments from Prominent Figures
저명한 인물의 비판적 논평
Wikipedia’s founder Jimmy Wales started a debate that could lead to big controversies. The reason for this was his statements comparing banks with Bitcoin. This resonated within the crypto community. A response to Wales’s statements came from John Deaton, one of the leading advocates of the Ripple-SEC case. Deaton adopted a personal stance against Wales’s statement.
Meanwhile, Deaton explained the subject through an example. Deaton, who talked about a $19,000 cash withdrawal attempt at a bank in the past, mentioned that he was subjected to significant delays due to the absence of a manager by the bank teller. Deaton added that Bitcoin produced 144 more blocks during the time he waited.
한편 Deaton은 예를 통해 주제를 설명했습니다. 과거 한 은행에서 19,000달러의 현금 인출 시도에 대해 이야기한 디턴은 은행원의 관리자 부재로 인해 상당한 지연을 겪었다고 언급했다. Deaton은 비트코인이 그가 기다리는 동안 144개의 블록을 더 생성했다고 덧붙였습니다.
In addition, Dogecoin founder Billy Markus, who uses the username X Shibetoshi Nakamoto, also criticized. He accused Jimmy Wales of constantly making financial requests on behalf of the Wikipedia platform.
Reaction to Bitcoin Vs Bank Debate
비트코인 대 은행 논쟁에 대한 반응
Those who criticized Wales’s post were not limited to this, and he also received criticisms from leading figures in the crypto world. Erik Voorhees, the CEO of cryptocurrency exchange ShapeShift, criticized Wikipedia’s donation model and stated that there would be no need for such expectations if the company had invested in Bitcoin 10 years ago.
웨일스의 게시물을 비판하는 사람들은 이에 국한되지 않고 암호화폐계 주요 인사들로부터도 비판을 받았다. 암호화폐 거래소 ShapeShift의 CEO인 Erik Voorhees는 Wikipedia의 기부 모델을 비판하며 회사가 10년 전에 비트코인에 투자했다면 그러한 기대는 필요하지 않았을 것이라고 말했습니다.
On the other hand, crypto follower YouTuber Wendy O, while praising the accountability of the person at the core of Bitcoin, took her criticism a step further and stated that banks rob daily. She then defended Bitcoin’s morality.
The perspective of crypto advocates like John Deaton and Billy Markus against the views of the founder of Wikipedia paves the way for questioning the reliability of traditional banking while providing support against the ongoing discourse surrounding the potential of cryptocurrencies. In this regard, the development in the financial structure contributes to the shaping of concepts such as autonomy, efficiency, and accountability for the future.
Wikipedia 창립자의 견해에 반대하는 John Deaton 및 Billy Markus와 같은 암호 화폐 옹호자들의 관점은 암호 화폐의 잠재력을 둘러싼 지속적인 담론에 대한 지지를 제공하는 동시에 전통적인 은행의 신뢰성에 의문을 제기하는 길을 열어줍니다. 이러한 측면에서 재무구조의 발전은 자율성, 효율성, 미래에 대한 책임성 등의 개념 형성에 기여합니다.
Continue Reading: https://en.coin-turk.com/wikipedia-founder-sparks-debate-comparing-banks-and-bitcoin/계속 읽기: https://en.coin-turk.com/wikipedia-founder-sparks-debate-comparing-banks-and-bitcoin/