Wikipedia’s founder, JimmyWales, recently garnered attention with a controversy he initiated. In a statement he made on social media a short while ago, he compared the reliability of banks with Bitcoin’s functionality, sparking a heated debate. Among those who joined the debate were prominent figures in the crypto world such as XRP lawyer John Deaton and Dogecoin founder Billy Markus.
维基百科的创始人吉米威尔士最近因其引发的一场争议而引起了人们的关注。他不久前在社交媒体上发表的声明中,将银行的可靠性与比特币的功能进行了比较,引发了激烈的争论。加入这场辩论的人中有加密货币世界的知名人士,如 XRP 律师约翰·迪顿和狗狗币创始人比利·马库斯。
Critical Comments from Prominent Figures
知名人士的批评
Wikipedia’s founder Jimmy Wales started a debate that could lead to big controversies. The reason for this was his statements comparing banks with Bitcoin. This resonated within the crypto community. A response to Wales’s statements came from John Deaton, one of the leading advocates of the Ripple-SEC case. Deaton adopted a personal stance against Wales’s statement.
维基百科的创始人吉米·威尔士发起了一场可能引发巨大争议的辩论。原因是他的言论将银行与比特币进行了比较。这在加密货币社区中引起了共鸣。 Ripple-SEC 案件的主要倡导者之一 John Deaton 对威尔士的声明做出了回应。迪顿对威尔士的声明采取了个人立场。
Meanwhile, Deaton explained the subject through an example. Deaton, who talked about a $19,000 cash withdrawal attempt at a bank in the past, mentioned that he was subjected to significant delays due to the absence of a manager by the bank teller. Deaton added that Bitcoin produced 144 more blocks during the time he waited.
与此同时,迪顿通过一个例子解释了这个主题。迪顿谈到了他过去在一家银行尝试提取 19,000 美元现金的经历,他提到,由于银行出纳员经理缺席,他的提款工作受到了严重延误。 Deaton 补充说,在他等待的时间里,比特币又产生了 144 个区块。
In addition, Dogecoin founder Billy Markus, who uses the username X Shibetoshi Nakamoto, also criticized. He accused Jimmy Wales of constantly making financial requests on behalf of the Wikipedia platform.
此外,使用用户名X Shibetoshi Nakamoto的狗狗币创始人Billy Markus也提出了批评。他指责吉米·威尔士不断代表维基百科平台提出财务请求。
Reaction to Bitcoin Vs Bank Debate
对比特币与银行辩论的反应
Those who criticized Wales’s post were not limited to this, and he also received criticisms from leading figures in the crypto world. Erik Voorhees, the CEO of cryptocurrency exchange ShapeShift, criticized Wikipedia’s donation model and stated that there would be no need for such expectations if the company had invested in Bitcoin 10 years ago.
批评威尔士帖子的人不仅限于此,他还受到了加密世界领军人物的批评。加密货币交易所 ShapeShift 首席执行官 Erik Voorhees 批评了维基百科的捐赠模式,并表示如果该公司 10 年前就投资了比特币,就没有必要有这样的期望。
On the other hand, crypto follower YouTuber Wendy O, while praising the accountability of the person at the core of Bitcoin, took her criticism a step further and stated that banks rob daily. She then defended Bitcoin’s morality.
另一方面,加密货币追随者 YouTuber Wendy O 在赞扬比特币核心人物的责任感的同时,更进一步提出批评,称银行每天都在抢劫。然后她捍卫了比特币的道德。
The perspective of crypto advocates like John Deaton and Billy Markus against the views of the founder of Wikipedia paves the way for questioning the reliability of traditional banking while providing support against the ongoing discourse surrounding the potential of cryptocurrencies. In this regard, the development in the financial structure contributes to the shaping of concepts such as autonomy, efficiency, and accountability for the future.
约翰·迪顿 (John Deaton) 和比利·马库斯 (Billy Markus) 等加密货币倡导者的观点与维基百科创始人的观点相反,为质疑传统银行业务的可靠性铺平了道路,同时为围绕加密货币潜力的持续讨论提供了支持。在这方面,金融结构的发展有助于塑造自主权、效率和未来责任等概念。
Continue Reading: https://en.coin-turk.com/wikipedia-founder-sparks-debate-comparing-banks-and-bitcoin/继续阅读:https://en.coin-turk.com/wikipedia-Founder-sparks-debate-comparing-banks-and-bitcoin/