Critical Comments from Prominent Figures

知名人士的批評

Wikipedia’s founder Jimmy Wales started a debate that could lead to big controversies. The reason for this was his statements comparing banks with Bitcoin. This resonated within the crypto community. A response to Wales’s statements came from John Deaton, one of the leading advocates of the Ripple-SEC case. Deaton adopted a personal stance against Wales’s statement.

維基百科的創始人吉米·威爾士發起了一場可能引發巨大爭議的辯論。原因是他的言論將銀行與比特幣進行了比較。這在加密貨幣社群中引起了共鳴。 Ripple-SEC 案件的主要倡導者之一 John Deaton 對威爾斯的聲明做出了回應。迪頓對威爾斯的聲明採取了個人立場。

Meanwhile, Deaton explained the subject through an example. Deaton, who talked about a $19,000 cash withdrawal attempt at a bank in the past, mentioned that he was subjected to significant delays due to the absence of a manager by the bank teller. Deaton added that Bitcoin produced 144 more blocks during the time he waited.

同時，迪頓透過一個例子解釋了這個主題。迪頓談到了他過去在一家銀行嘗試提取 19,000 美元現金的經歷，他提到，由於銀行出納員經理缺席，他的提款工作受到了嚴重延誤。 Deaton 補充說，在他等待的時間裡，比特幣又產生了 144 個區塊。

In addition, Dogecoin founder Billy Markus, who uses the username X Shibetoshi Nakamoto, also criticized. He accused Jimmy Wales of constantly making financial requests on behalf of the Wikipedia platform.

此外，使用用戶名X Shibetoshi Nakamoto的狗狗幣創始人Billy Markus也提出了批評。他指責吉米·威爾士不斷代表維基百科平台提出財務請求。

Reaction to Bitcoin Vs Bank Debate

對比特幣與銀行辯論的反應

Those who criticized Wales’s post were not limited to this, and he also received criticisms from leading figures in the crypto world. Erik Voorhees, the CEO of cryptocurrency exchange ShapeShift, criticized Wikipedia’s donation model and stated that there would be no need for such expectations if the company had invested in Bitcoin 10 years ago.

批評威爾斯貼文的人不僅限於此，他還受到了加密世界領導者的批評。加密貨幣交易所 ShapeShift 執行長 Erik Voorhees 批評了維基百科的捐贈模式，並表示如果該公司 10 年前就投資了比特幣，就沒有必要有這樣的期望。

On the other hand, crypto follower YouTuber Wendy O, while praising the accountability of the person at the core of Bitcoin, took her criticism a step further and stated that banks rob daily. She then defended Bitcoin’s morality.

另一方面，加密貨幣追隨者 YouTuber Wendy O 在讚揚比特幣核心人物的責任感的同時，更進一步提出批評，稱銀行每天都在搶劫。然後她捍衛了比特幣的道德。

The perspective of crypto advocates like John Deaton and Billy Markus against the views of the founder of Wikipedia paves the way for questioning the reliability of traditional banking while providing support against the ongoing discourse surrounding the potential of cryptocurrencies. In this regard, the development in the financial structure contributes to the shaping of concepts such as autonomy, efficiency, and accountability for the future.

約翰·迪頓(John Deaton) 和比利·馬庫斯(Billy Markus) 等加密貨幣倡導者的觀點與維基百科創始人的觀點相反，為質疑傳統銀行業務的可靠性鋪平了道路，同時為圍繞加密貨幣潛力的持續討論提供了支持。在這方面，金融結構的發展有助於塑造自主權、效率和未來責任等概念。

繼續閱讀：https://en.coin-turk.com/wikipedia-Founder-sparks-debate-comparing-banks-and-bitcoin/