允許質押的網路實施權益證明 [PoS] 共識機制。目前，投資者可以質押多種資產，包括以太坊、Cardano、MATIC、Solana、BNB、Tron、Polkadot、Cosmos、Avalanche 等。根據質押獎勵，年度獎勵在 2% 至 20% 之間變化。前10 名資產[按質押市值]。

Dogecoin uses the Proof of Work consensus mechanism to validate transactions on its blockchain. As a result, this asset cannot be staked in the traditional decentralized way. Marshall Hayner, CEO at Metallicus and Co-Founder of FBBT Holdings, recently posted a poll on X [formerly Twitter] asking users if they would stake Dogecoin if that option was available to them. Among the 2,200 people who voted, 60.1% were not in favor of DOGE staking.

狗狗幣使用工作量證明共識機制來驗證其區塊鏈上的交易。因此，該資產無法以傳統的去中心化方式進行質押。 Metallicus 執行長兼 FBBT Holdings 聯合創始人 Marshall Hayner 最近在 X [前身為 Twitter] 上發布了一項民意調查，詢問用戶如果有這種選擇，他們是否會投資狗狗幣。在投票的 2,200 人中，60.1% 不贊成 DOGE 質押。

Also Read: Here’s How Litecoin Provides Security to the Dogecoin Network

另請閱讀：萊特幣如何為狗狗幣網路提供安全性

Is PoS a feasible option for Dogecoin?

PoS 是狗狗幣的可行選擇嗎？

People from the crypto community have time and again expressed their cynicism towards PoS. A section of people believed that the PoS system is nothing but “rule by the rich” because the distribution of capital is “massively skewed” to the top creamy layer. Others keep pointing out that are several other options other than PoS, and projects need to explore them as well.

加密社群的人們曾多次表達對 PoS 的冷嘲熱諷。一部分人認為 PoS​​ 系統只不過是“富人統治”，因為資本的分配“嚴重偏向”頂層。其他人不斷指出，除了 PoS 之外，還有其他幾種選擇，項目也需要探索它們。

質押通常要求代幣被鎖定一定期限，禁止其轉移或在市場上提供活躍的流動性。因此，人們也認為質押率越高，底層區塊鏈的用例就越少。由於 DOGE 用於交易，一些人強調質押該資產是不可行的。

Dogecoin developer Mishaboar was also against this proposal. He stated that he might step away from the project if Dogecoin transitioned to Proof of Stake. He said that PoS is not a sensible approach when a huge chunk of the supply is held within exchanges. Mishaboar added,

狗狗幣開發商 Mishaboar 也反對這項提案。他表示，如果狗狗幣轉向權益證明，他可能會退出該專案。他表示，當大量供應儲存在交易所內時，PoS 並不是一種明智的方法。米沙布爾補充道，

“Research on alternative consensus mechanisms is no problem if done responsibly, relying on solid data, and avoiding hype. But it seems most PoS chains have underdelivered, are obscenely centralized and run by wealthy developers holding huge bags, have failed catastrophically, and/or are a pain to use.”

「如果負責任地進行、依賴可靠數據並避免炒作，對替代共識機制的研究是沒有問題的。但似乎大多數 PoS 鏈都交付不足，過於中心化，並且由持有巨額資金的富有開發商運營，已經災難性地失敗了，並且/或者使用起來很痛苦。”

He also explained that one of the biggest advantages of PoS for a currency is lower energy usage and faster transactions. However, he pointed out, for most transactions that is not essentially needed. Contrarily, for the ones that require speed, that could be achieved with other solutions like payment channels, integration with payment providers, etc.

他還解釋說，PoS 對於貨幣來說最大的優勢之一是更低的能源消耗和更快的交易。然而，他指出，對於大多數交易來說，這並不是必要的。相反，對於需要速度的人來說，可以透過其他解決方案來實現，例如支付管道、與支付提供者的整合等。

Also Read: Friend.tech Earns $1.42 Million Fee: Beats Bitcoin, MetaMask, Solana

另請閱讀：Friend.tech 賺取 142 萬美元費用：擊敗比特幣、MetaMask、Solana

The flip side

另一面

傳統上，質押代幣充當新交易合法性的保證人。因此，社區專家多次表達專案需要轉向PoS的原因。以太坊聯合創始人 Vitalik Buterin 最近表示，他預計狗狗幣會在某個時候切換到這個機制。他加了，

“As PoS matures, I expect it to increase in legitimacy.”

“隨著 PoS 的成熟，我預計它的合法性將會增加。”

Also Read: Solana ‘Flips’ Dogecoin at the $9 Billion Market Cap

另請閱讀：Solana 以 90 億美元的市值“翻轉”狗狗幣

• doge

總督

• Dogecoin

狗狗幣

• pos

位置

• Pow

戰俘

• staking

質押