Key Points:

要點：

• A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit against Elon Musk and Tesla alleging manipulation of Dogecoin's price.
• The lawsuit claimed that Musk's statements and actions drove up Dogecoin's value, leading to insider trading and market manipulation.

Judge Dismisses Elon Musk Dogecoin Lawsuit

一名聯邦法官駁回了針對伊隆馬斯克和特斯拉涉嫌操縱狗狗幣價格的訴訟。法官駁回伊隆馬斯克狗狗幣訴訟

According to Reuters, a federal judge has dismissed a class-action lawsuit against Elon Musk and Tesla, which accused Musk of manipulating the price of Dogecoin and causing investor losses.

根據路透社報道，一名聯邦法官駁回了針對伊隆馬斯克和特斯拉的集體訴訟，指控馬斯克操縱狗狗幣價格並造成投資者損失。

District Judge Alvin Hellerstein ruled in favor of Musk on August 29, finding that the claims against him were impossible to prove.

地區法官阿爾文·海勒斯坦 (Alvin Hellerstein) 於 8 月 29 日做出了對馬斯克有利的裁決，認為針對他的指控無法得到證實。

Lawsuit Alleged Market Manipulation and Insider Trading

涉嫌市場操縱和內線交易的訴訟

The amended class-action complaint, filed in June 2022, claimed that Musk used his social media platform to inflate Dogecoin's value by over 36,000%.

修改後的集體訴訟於 2022 年 6 月提交，聲稱馬斯克利用他的社群媒體平台將狗狗幣的價值誇大了 36,000% 以上。

The plaintiffs alleged that Musk's tweets, public appearances, and stunts, such as changing Twitter's logo to the Dogecoin symbol, artificially drove up the cryptocurrency's value, enabling Musk and Tesla to profit through insider trading.

原告聲稱，馬斯克的推文、公開露面和特技，例如將 Twitter 的徽標更改為狗狗幣符號，人為推高了加密貨幣的價值，使馬斯克和特斯拉能夠透過內線交易獲利。

Court Finds Musk's Tweets Aspirational, Not Fraudulent

法院認為馬斯克的推文是有抱負的，而不是欺詐性的

Judge Hellerstein dismissed these claims, stating that Musk's tweets about Dogecoin were "aspirational" and could not reasonably be relied on as factual statements by investors. He also found that the plaintiffs' allegations of market manipulation and insider trading were unclear and incoherent.

海勒斯坦法官駁回了這些說法，稱馬斯克關於狗狗幣的推文是“有抱負的”，投資者不能合理地將其視為事實陳述。他還發現，原告關於市場操縱和內線交易的指控不明確且不連貫。

Lawsuit Dismissed with Prejudice

訴訟因偏見被駁回

The dismissal with prejudice means that the case cannot be refiled. Lawyers for the investors have not yet commented on the ruling. Musk's legal team has previously described the lawsuit as a "fanciful work of fiction." In response to the decision, Musk's attorney, Alex Spiro, said that it was a "very good day for Dogecoin."

因偏見而被駁回意味著案件不能重新提起。投資者的律師尚未對裁決發表評論。馬斯克的法律團隊先前曾將這起訴訟描述為「奇幻的虛構作品」。針對這項決定，馬斯克的律師亞歷克斯·斯皮羅表示，這是「對狗狗幣來說非常好的一天」。