Controversy Surrounding Polkadot's Treatment of Asian-Led Projects

圍繞 Polkadot 對待亞洲主導項目的爭議

The Polkadot blockchain ecosystem has become embroiled in a debate regarding its treatment of Asian-led projects. Accusations of unfair practices and a hostile environment have surfaced, prompting discussions about inclusivity in the blockchain space.

Polkadot 區塊鏈生態系統已經捲入了關於其如何對待亞洲主導項目的爭論。對不公平做法和敵對環境的指控已經浮出水面，引發了關於區塊鏈領域包容性的討論。

Allegations and Experiences

指控和經歷

Victor Ji, co-founder of Manta Network, has voiced concerns about the Polkadot ecosystem, describing it as "highly toxic" for Asian projects. Ji claims that after initial support from the Web3 Foundation, he experienced a decline in support after securing funding. He cites complex politics, exclusive groups, and grant acquisition difficulties as challenges.

Manta Network 聯合創始人 Victor Ji 表達了對 Polkadot 生態系統的擔憂，稱其對亞洲項目具有「劇毒」。 Ji 聲稱，在獲得 Web3 基金會最初的支持後，他在獲得資金後經歷了支持的下降。他將複雜的政治、排他性群體和撥款獲取困難視為挑戰。

These allegations were echoed by Harold Yu, founder of DIN, who highlighted the complexities and burdens of the grant application process. Both Ji and Yu noted a contrast in experiences compared to European and US-based projects, which they perceive to have greater ease in securing substantial grants.

DIN 創辦人 Harold Yu 也同意這些指控，他強調了撥款申請過程的複雜性和負擔。 Ji 和 Yu 都指出了與歐洲和美國計畫相比的經驗對比，他們認為這些計畫更容易獲得大量資助。

Financial Context and Community Response

金融背景和社區反應

Polkadot's recent financial report for the first half of the year has added to the controversy. The report revealed significant expenditures of 11 million DOTs, with $37 million allocated solely to marketing. This high spending has drawn criticism from the community, who question the effectiveness of these investments.

波卡近期公佈的上半年財報更是雪上加霜。該報告披露了 1,100 萬 DOT 的巨額支出，其中 3,700 萬美元專門用於行銷。如此高的支出引起了社會的批評，他們質疑這些投資的有效性。

The current expenditure rate suggests that Polkadot's funds may be depleted within two years, raising concerns about the sustainability of the ecosystem's financial strategy. This has fueled the debate about resource allocation and support for diverse projects within Polkadot.

目前的支出率表明，Polkadot 的資金可能會在兩年內耗盡，引發人們對生態系統財務策略可持續性的擔憂。這引發了有關 Polkadot 內部資源分配和對不同專案支援的爭論。

Implications for Diversity and Inclusivity

對多元包容的影響

The allegations and experiences raised by Asian project leaders have brought to the forefront important questions about diversity and equal opportunities in the rapidly evolving blockchain space. Concerns have been raised regarding whether the Polkadot ecosystem's support structure and grant allocation processes lack inclusivity and fairness.

亞洲專案領導人提出的指控和經驗將快速發展的區塊鏈領域中關於多元化和平等機會的重要問題帶到了最前沿。人們擔心 Polkadot 生態系統的支援結構和撥款分配流程是否缺乏包容性和公平性。

These issues highlight the need for greater transparency and accountability in the allocation of resources and support for projects within the Polkadot ecosystem. It is vital to create an environment that fosters inclusivity and provides equal opportunities for projects from diverse backgrounds to succeed.

這些問題凸顯了在 Polkadot 生態系統內的資源分配和專案支援方面需要提高透明度和問責制。創造一個促進包容性並為來自不同背景的計畫提供平等機會的環境至關重要。