Ripple vs. SEC Update: Intensified Legal Battle

Ripple 與 SEC 更新：激烈的法律鬥爭

In a pivotal development in the ongoing legal saga between Ripple and the SEC, the SEC's recent filing has reignited controversy.

Ripple 和 SEC 之間正在進行的法律糾紛的一個關鍵進展是，SEC 最近的文件重新引發了爭議。

Ripple's Argument: Binance Ruling as Precedent

Ripple 的論點：幣安的裁決是先例

In a previous filing, Ripple cited the court's recent decision involving Binance to counter the SEC's proposed penalties. The SEC's response refutes this, dismissing Ripple's reliance on the Binance ruling as irrelevant.

在先前的文件中，Ripple 引用了法院最近涉及幣安的裁決，以對抗 SEC 擬議的處罰。美國證券交易委員會的回應反駁了這一點，認為 Ripple 對幣安裁決的依賴是無關緊要的。

SEC's Defense: Ripple's Conduct Distinct

SEC 辯護：Ripple 的行為獨特

The SEC argues that Ripple's alleged conduct differs significantly from the Binance case. They assert that Ripple's "reckless disregard for the law" warrants strong penalties, despite the Binance ruling.

美國證券交易委員會認為，Ripple 被指控的行為與幣安案有很大不同。他們聲稱，儘管幣安做出了裁決，但 Ripple 的「魯莽無視法律」仍應受到嚴厲處罰。

Crypto Expert's Reaction: SEC's Frustration

加密貨幣專家的反應：SEC 的沮喪

Crypto lawyer Bill Morgan suggests the SEC's language reflects their frustration with the Binance ruling being used against them. He notes that the SEC often dismisses unfavorable decisions as "not an authority."

加密貨幣律師比爾摩根表示，美國證券交易委員會的措辭反映了他們對幣安的裁決被用來對付他們的不滿。他指出，美國證券交易委員會經常以「不是權威」為由駁回不利的決定。

Fair Notice Defense: SEC Highlights Binance Dismissal

公平通知辯護：SEC 強調幣安解僱案

The SEC's filing emphasizes that the court in the Binance case also rejected the fair notice defense, which Ripple has asserted. They cite the SEC's 2017 DAO Report as ample notice to the industry.

美國證券交易委員會的文件強調，幣安案中的法院也駁回了 Ripple 所主張的公平通知抗辯。他們引用 SEC 2017 年 DAO 報告作為對該行業的充分通知。

Ripple's Aim: Tailored Regulations for Digital Assets

Ripple的目標：為數位資產量身定制監管

Ripple's reference to the Binance case seeks to highlight the need for tailored regulations specific to digital assets. They argue that existing securities laws may not be directly applicable to cryptocurrencies.

Ripple 提及幣安案例旨在強調針對數位資產制定客製化監管的必要性。他們認為，現有的證券法可能不會直接適用於加密貨幣。

Legal Experts' Views: SEC's Response Criticized

法律專家觀點：SEC的回應受到批評

Legal expert Jeremy Hogan criticizes the SEC's response as evasive, lacking substantive reasons to disagree with Ripple's interpretation of the Binance ruling. He calls for more concrete arguments from the SEC.

法律專家傑里米·霍根 (Jeremy Hogan) 批評 SEC 的回應閃爍其辭，缺乏實質性理由不同意 Ripple 對幣安裁決的解釋。他呼籲美國證券交易委員會提供更具體的論點。

Ripple's Strategy: Clarity and Consistency

Ripple 的策略：清晰性和一致性

Ripple's use of the Binance case aims to demonstrate inconsistencies in the SEC's approach to digital asset regulation. They seek reduced penalties and clear guidelines to ensure fair enforcement and industry compliance.

Ripple 使用幣安案例的目的是證明 SEC 的數位資產監管方法存在不一致之處。他們尋求減少處罰和明確的指導方針，以確保公平執法和行業合規。