美国法官裁定人工智能创作的作品不符合版权保护资格

This decision is timely given the widespread fear of generative AI.

鉴于人们对生成式人工智能的普遍恐惧，这一决定是及时的。

Judge Howell stressed the importance of human authorship under copyright law.

豪厄尔法官强调了版权法下人类作者身份的重要性。

U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell has ruled that works fully created by artificial intelligence are not eligible for copyright protection. Thus, upholding the view of the U.S. Copyright Office. This decision is timely given the widespread fear that generative AI may one day replace human creators in fields like art and other similar fields.

美国地区法官贝丽尔·豪厄尔（Beryl Howell）裁定，完全由人工智能创作的作品不符合版权保护资格。因此，支持美国版权局的观点。鉴于人们普遍担心生成式人工智能有一天可能会在艺术和其他类似领域取代人类创造者，这一决定是及时的。

Concerns about AI eventually taking over scriptwriting have intensified as the writer’s strike has stretched on for more than a hundred days. But intellectual property law has always held that copyrights are exclusively given for human-made works.

随着编剧罢工持续一百多天，人们对人工智能最终接管剧本创作的担忧加剧。但知识产权法一直认为版权专属于人造作品。

Human Authorship

人类作者身份

Stephen Thaler challenged the governing body’s reluctance to register AI-generated works in court. Imagination Engines’ CEO and neural network expert, Thaler, believes that AI should be given authorship credit when it achieves the necessary standards. Therefore, the person who owns the machine should be considered the owner of the product.

斯蒂芬·塞勒 (Stephen Thaler) 对管理机构不愿在法庭上注册人工智能生成的作品提出质疑。 Imagination Engines 的首席执行官兼神经网络专家 Thaler 认为，当人工智能达到必要的标准时，就应该给予作者署名权。因此，拥有机器的人应被视为产品的所有者。

However, Judge Howell ruled otherwise, stressing the importance of human authorship under copyright law. She referred to earlier precedents that ruled that only human authors’ unique ideas deserved legal protection.

然而，豪厄尔法官却做出了相反的裁决，强调版权法下人类作者的重要性。她提到了早期的先例，这些先例规定，只有人类作者的独特想法才值得法律保护。

Judge Howell explained the rationale for copyright legislation, noting that it is meant to inspire people to create. She pointed out that the governing body was originally founded to safeguard copyrights and patents because it was believed that granting people exclusive rights in these areas would encourage innovation in various fields. As courts debate whether or not it is permissible for AI corporations to train their algorithms on copyrighted works, this decision is timely.

豪厄尔法官解释了版权立法的基本原理，指出它的目的是激励人们创造。她指出，该管理机构最初成立的目的是为了保护版权和专利，因为人们相信授予人们在这些领域的专有权将鼓励各个领域的创新。当法院争论是否允许人工智能公司在受版权保护的作品上训练其算法时，这一决定是及时的。

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

今日重点加密新闻：

Key Dogecoin Developer Hints at Exit Amid Concerns Over Proof-of-Stake

由于对权益证明的担忧，狗狗币主要开发商暗示退出