You can also read this news on COINTURK NEWS: US Supreme Court Rules on Coinbase's Sweepstakes Dispute

您还可以在 COINTURK NEWS 上阅读此新闻：美国最高法院对 Coinbase 抽奖纠纷的裁决

The United States Supreme Court has invalidated Coinbase's user agreement, allowing district courts to resolve disputes related to Dogecoin sweepstakes. Cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase launched a Dogecoin sweepstakes promotion in June 2021, but the user agreement contained conflicting clauses regarding dispute resolution. Coinbase preferred arbitration for financial disputes, while users favored court intervention. Both options were stated separately in the platform's agreements.

美国最高法院宣布 Coinbase 的用户协议无效，允许地区法院解决与狗狗币抽奖相关的纠纷。加密货币交易所 Coinbase 于 2021 年 6 月推出了狗狗币抽奖促销活动，但用户协议中包含有关争议解决的冲突条款。 Coinbase 更倾向于对金融纠纷进行仲裁，而用户则倾向于法院干预。这两种选择均在平台协议中单独说明。

What is Happening on the Coinbase Front?

Coinbase 方面发生了什么？

On May 23, the US Supreme Court ruled that state and federal courts would have sole jurisdiction over disputes related to Coinbase's sweepstakes promotion. The Court's decision included the following statement:

5 月 23 日，美国最高法院裁定，州法院和联邦法院对 Coinbase 抽奖活动相关争议拥有唯一管辖权。法院的裁决包括以下声明：

"We concluded that the court, not the arbitrator, should decide whether the parties' initial agreement was invalidated by the second agreement. The Ninth Circuit's decision is affirmed."

“我们的结论是，应该由法院而不是仲裁员来决定双方的最初协议是否因第二份协议而无效。第九巡回法院的决定得到维持。”

In a concurring opinion, Judge Neil Gorsuch, nominated by President Donald Trump in 2017, emphasized that arbitration is a matter of contract and stated:

唐纳德·特朗普总统于 2017 年提名的尼尔·戈萨奇法官在一致意见中强调仲裁是合同问题，并指出：

"Parties can agree by contract that an arbitrator, rather than a court, will resolve threshold arbitrability questions as well as underlying merits disputes."

“双方可以通过合同约定由仲裁员而不是法院来解决可仲裁性问题以及潜在的实体争议。”

The Supreme Court ultimately rejected Coinbase's previous claims that the Court's approach could invite chaos by facilitating challenges to delegation provisions. The decision stated that the Court did not believe such chaos would ensue. In the US, courts do not have the authority to intervene in disputes if contracts contain only an arbitration clause.

最高法院最终驳回了 Coinbase 之前的主张，即法院的做法可能会促进对授权条款的挑战，从而引发混乱。判决指出，法院不认为会发生这种混乱。在美国，如果合同仅包含仲裁条款，法院无权干预纠纷。

Details Draw Attention

细节引人关注

However, when users agree to two contracts, the court must decide which contract is valid. Coinbase recently experienced a major outage affecting its trade services on mobile and desktop applications.

然而，当用户同意两份合同时，法院必须判定哪份合同有效。 Coinbase 最近经历了一次重大中断，影响了其移动和桌面应用程序的交易服务。

Coinbase Support's official X account posted about the outage on May 14. The account stated that Coinbase was investigating the issue and working on a solution. The account also reiterated that users' funds were safe. During the outage, many users encountered a 503 Service Temporarily Unavailable error message on the website. According to a developer guide on Mozilla, the most common reason for this error is that the servers are either down for maintenance or overloaded.

Coinbase 支持的官方 X 账户于 5 月 14 日发布了有关此次中断的信息。该账户表示 Coinbase 正在调查该问题并寻求解决方案。该账户还重申用户资金是安全的。停电期间，许多用户在网站上遇到了“503服务暂时不可用”的错误消息。根据 Mozilla 上的开发人员指南，出现此错误的最常见原因是服务器因维护而停机或过载。

The post first appeared on COINTURK NEWS: US Supreme Court Rules on Coinbase's Sweepstakes Dispute

该帖子首次出现在 COINTURK 新闻：美国最高法院对 Coinbase 抽奖纠纷的裁决