,You can also read this news on BH NEWS: Supreme Court Overrules Coinbase’s Agreement
The United States Supreme Court has nullified Coinbase’s user agreement, thus allowing district courts to handle disputes regarding its Dogecoin sweepstakes promotion. The promotion, launched in June 2021, faced controversy due to conflicting clauses in the user agreement over dispute resolution. While Coinbase favored arbitration, users preferred court intervention, and both methods were mentioned separately in the platform’s agreements.
What is Happening on the Coinbase Front?
On May 23, the Supreme Court ruled that state and federal courts possess exclusive jurisdiction over disputes related to Coinbase’s sweepstakes, stating that the court, not an arbitrator, should determine the validity of the initial user agreement. This decision affirms the Ninth Circuit’s previous ruling.
Judge Neil Gorsuch, appointed by President Donald Trump in 2017, highlighted that arbitration is a contractual matter, noting that parties can agree via contract for an arbitrator to resolve critical arbitrability questions as well as the underlying disputes.
The Supreme Court dismissed Coinbase’s concerns that the court’s approach would cause chaos by challenging delegation provisions, asserting that such chaos is unlikely. In the US, courts cannot intervene in disputes if contracts include only an arbitration clause.
Details Draw Attention
However, if users agree on two different contracts, the court must decide which one is valid. Recently, Coinbase experienced a significant outage affecting its trading services on both mobile and desktop platforms.
Coinbase Support’s official X account addressed the outage on May 14, indicating that they were investigating and working on a solution. The account emphasized that users’ funds remained safe. During this period, many users encountered a 503 Service Temporarily Unavailable error message on the website, often caused by server maintenance or overload, according to Mozilla’s developer guide.
User Takeaways

,您也可以在 BH NEWS 上閱讀此訊息：最高法院否決 Coinbase 的協議 美國最高法院已宣布 Coinbase 的用戶協議無效，從而允許地區法院處理有關其狗狗幣抽獎促銷的爭議。該促銷活動於 2021 年 6 月推出，由於用戶協議中關於爭議解決的條款相互衝突而面臨爭議。雖然Coinbase 傾向於仲裁，但用戶更傾向於法院幹預，這兩種方式都在平台協議中單獨提及。相關的爭議擁有專屬管轄權抽獎活動，指出應由法院而不是仲裁員來確定初始使用者協議的有效性。該裁決維持了第九巡迴法院之前的裁決。仲裁性問題以及潛在爭議最高法院駁回了 Coinbase 的擔憂，即法院的做法會透過質疑授權條款而造成混亂，並聲稱這種混亂不太可能發生。在美國，如果合約僅包含仲裁條款，法院就不能介入糾紛。最近，Coinbase 經歷了嚴重的中斷，影響了其在行動和桌面平台上的交易服務。該帳戶強調用戶的資金仍然安全。根據 Mozilla 的開發者指南，在此期間，許多使用者在網站上遇到了 503 服務暫時無法使用的錯誤訊息，這通常是由於伺服器維護或過載造成的。

Disputes regarding Coinbase’s sweepstakes will be handled by state and federal courts, not through arbitration.
The court ruling emphasizes the importance of clear user agreements to avoid conflicting clauses.
Regular communication and transparency from support teams are crucial during service outages to maintain user trust.

有關 Coinbase 抽獎的爭議將由州和聯邦法院處理，而不是透過仲裁。法院裁決強調了明確的使用者協議以避免條款衝突的重要性。在服務中斷期間，支援團隊的定期溝通和透明度對於維持使用者信任至關重要。

In conclusion, the Supreme Court’s decision underscores the necessity for well-defined user agreements and the pivotal role of the judiciary in resolving disputes, ensuring clarity and fairness in contractual matters.
The post first appeared on BH NEWS: Supreme Court Overrules Coinbase’s Agreement

總之，最高法院的判決強調了明確用戶協議的必要性以及司法機構在解決糾紛、確保合約事項的清晰度和公平性方面的關鍵作用。協定