,You can also read this news on BH NEWS: Supreme Court Overrules Coinbase’s Agreement
The United States Supreme Court has nullified Coinbase’s user agreement, thus allowing district courts to handle disputes regarding its Dogecoin sweepstakes promotion. The promotion, launched in June 2021, faced controversy due to conflicting clauses in the user agreement over dispute resolution. While Coinbase favored arbitration, users preferred court intervention, and both methods were mentioned separately in the platform’s agreements.
What is Happening on the Coinbase Front?
On May 23, the Supreme Court ruled that state and federal courts possess exclusive jurisdiction over disputes related to Coinbase’s sweepstakes, stating that the court, not an arbitrator, should determine the validity of the initial user agreement. This decision affirms the Ninth Circuit’s previous ruling.
Judge Neil Gorsuch, appointed by President Donald Trump in 2017, highlighted that arbitration is a contractual matter, noting that parties can agree via contract for an arbitrator to resolve critical arbitrability questions as well as the underlying disputes.
The Supreme Court dismissed Coinbase’s concerns that the court’s approach would cause chaos by challenging delegation provisions, asserting that such chaos is unlikely. In the US, courts cannot intervene in disputes if contracts include only an arbitration clause.
Details Draw Attention
However, if users agree on two different contracts, the court must decide which one is valid. Recently, Coinbase experienced a significant outage affecting its trading services on both mobile and desktop platforms.
Coinbase Support’s official X account addressed the outage on May 14, indicating that they were investigating and working on a solution. The account emphasized that users’ funds remained safe. During this period, many users encountered a 503 Service Temporarily Unavailable error message on the website, often caused by server maintenance or overload, according to Mozilla’s developer guide.
User Takeaways

,您还可以在 BH NEWS 上阅读此消息：最高法院否决 Coinbase 的协议 美国最高法院已宣布 Coinbase 的用户协议无效，从而允许地区法院处理有关其狗狗币抽奖促销的争议。该促销活动于 2021 年 6 月推出，由于用户协议中关于争议解决的条款相互冲突而面临争议。虽然 Coinbase 倾向于仲裁，但用户更倾向于法院干预，这两种方式都在平台协议中单独提及。Coinbase 方面发生了什么？5 月 23 日，最高法院裁定，州法院和联邦法院对与 Coinbase 相关的争议拥有专属管辖权抽奖活动，指出应由法院而不是仲裁员来确定初始用户协议的有效性。该裁决维持了第九巡回法院之前的裁决。唐纳德·特朗普总统于 2017 年任命的尼尔·戈萨奇法官强调仲裁是合同问题，并指出双方可以通过合同约定由仲裁员解决关键的可仲裁性问题以及潜在争议最高法院驳回了 Coinbase 的担忧，即法院的做法会通过质疑授权条款而造成混乱，并声称这种混乱不太可能发生。在美国，如果合同仅包含仲裁条款，法院就不能介入纠纷。细节引起注意但是，如果用户同意两份不同的合同，法院必须决定哪一份有效。最近，Coinbase 经历了严重的中断，影响了其在移动和桌面平台上的交易服务。Coinbase 支持的官方 X 帐户于 5 月 14 日解决了该中断问题，表明他们正在调查并制定解决方案。该账户强调用户的资金仍然安全。根据 Mozilla 的开发者指南，在此期间，许多用户在网站上遇到了 503 服务暂时不可用的错误消息，这通常是由于服务器维护或过载造成的。 用户要点

Disputes regarding Coinbase’s sweepstakes will be handled by state and federal courts, not through arbitration.
The court ruling emphasizes the importance of clear user agreements to avoid conflicting clauses.
Regular communication and transparency from support teams are crucial during service outages to maintain user trust.

有关 Coinbase 抽奖的争议将由州和联邦法院处理，而不是通过仲裁。法院裁决强调了明确的用户协议以避免条款冲突的重要性。在服务中断期间，支持团队的定期沟通和透明度对于维持用户信任至关重要。

In conclusion, the Supreme Court’s decision underscores the necessity for well-defined user agreements and the pivotal role of the judiciary in resolving disputes, ensuring clarity and fairness in contractual matters.
The post first appeared on BH NEWS: Supreme Court Overrules Coinbase’s Agreement

总之，最高法院的判决强调了明确用户协议的必要性以及司法机构在解决纠纷、确保合同事项的清晰度和公平性方面的关键作用。该帖子首先出现在 BH NEWS 上：最高法院否决了 Coinbase 的协议