The post Coinbase Loses Bid to Dismiss Dogecoin Class Action Lawsuit appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

Coinbase 驳回狗狗币集体诉讼败诉的帖子首先出现在 Coinpedia 金融科技新闻上

On November 3, the United States Supreme Court granted Coinbase’s request to hear a lawsuit concerning the company’s arbitration clause with its customers. Coinbase had tried to move a dispute stemming from a 2021 sweepstakes out of court and into private arbitration, but a lower court ruled that the exchange had raised its right to do so.

11 月 3 日，美国最高法院批准了 Coinbase 的请求，听取有关该公司与其客户的仲裁条款的诉讼。 Coinbase 曾试图将 2021 年抽奖引发的争议移出法庭并提交私人仲裁，但下级法院裁定该交易所已提出这样做​​的权利。

The allegations against Coinbase Exchange accusing them of false and fake advertising in the sweepstakes and the Supreme Court’s decision could have broader implications for arbitration clauses in contracts.

针对 Coinbase Exchange 在抽奖活动中虚假广告的指控以及最高法院的裁决可能会对合同中的仲裁条款产生更广泛的影响。

Detail of the Lawsuit!

诉讼详情！

The Coinbase lawsuit, which was filed in 2021, accused Coinbase of hiding the fact that users could enter the $1.2 million Dogecoin giveaway for free without having to trade $100 of the meme cryptocurrency on its platform, reports Reuters. It is a separate legal action from the lawsuit against Elon Musk over alleged price manipulation.

据路透社报道，Coinbase 于 2021 年提起诉讼，指控 Coinbase 隐瞒了这样一个事实：用户无需在其平台上交易 100 美元的狗狗币，就可以免费参与价值 120 万美元的狗狗币赠品。这是与针对埃隆·马斯克涉嫌价格操纵的诉讼分开的法律诉讼。

Plaintiff David Suski, the person who filed a $5 million lawsuit against Coinbase, claimed he was cheated into trading $100 of Dogecoin for an entry into a $1.2 million sweepstakes offer on Coinbase.

对 Coinbase 提起 500 万美元诉讼的原告 David Suski 声称，他被骗用 100 美元的狗狗币换取 Coinbase 上 120 万美元的抽奖机会。

The lawsuit says that free entry was likely into the sweepstakes, but Coinbase did not reveal this fact for its financial growth. Suski argues that he wouldn’t have disbursed if Coinbase had clearly disclosed there was another way to enter the sweepstakes. He claims that Coinbase disregarded state and federal laws, including deceptive trade practices and fake advertising.

该诉讼称，抽奖活动很可能是免费的，但 Coinbase 并未透露这一事实以考虑其财务增长。 Suski 辩称，如果 Coinbase 明确披露有另一种方式参与抽奖，他就不会支付。他声称 Coinbase 无视州和联邦法律，包括欺骗性贸易行为和虚假广告。

Debate Over Misleading Entrants!

关于误导性参赛者的争论！

Many users felt misled when the free entry option was revealed, with angry users on forums blaming Coinbase for trying to hide the information to artificially inflate demand and trading volume. The debate has also revived critiques of Coinbase’s treatment of Dogecoin, with some arguing its listing of the meme token lacked importance beyond generating publicity and trading fees.

当免费入场选项被揭露时，许多用户感到被误导了，论坛上愤怒的用户指责 Coinbase 试图隐藏信息，人为地抬高需求和交易量。这场辩论还重新引发了对 Coinbase 对狗狗币处理方式的批评，一些人认为，除了产生宣传和交易费用之外，该 meme 代币的上市缺乏重要性。

Coinbase had tried its level best to force the lawsuit into private arbitration, but a judge ruled that the sweepstakes terms specifying California courts as the forum superseded the account agreements.

Coinbase 已尽最大努力迫使诉讼进入私人仲裁，但法官裁定，指定加州法院作为论坛的抽奖条款取代了账户协议。